PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEU vs. POWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LEU vs. POWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a -32.55% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 176.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LEU has outperformed POWL with an annualized return of 46.90%, while POWL has yielded a comparatively lower 40.62% annualized return.


LEU

1D
1.21%
1M
-21.02%
YTD
-32.55%
6M
-39.02%
1Y
14.42%
3Y*
71.98%
5Y*
44.90%
10Y*
46.90%

POWL

1D
3.06%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
176.53%
6M
157.11%
1Y
362.43%
3Y*
142.81%
5Y*
94.52%
10Y*
40.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEU vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
-32.55%264.45%22.42%67.52%-34.92%115.78%236.19%307.10%-57.86%-37.15%
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
176.53%44.49%152.21%155.62%24.34%3.60%-37.60%101.58%-9.92%-24.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LEU and POWL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 1998

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEU:

$3.68B

POWL:

$10.73B

EPS

LEU:

$2.89

POWL:

$5.12

PE Ratio

LEU:

56.59

POWL:

57.36

PS Ratio

LEU:

7.58

POWL:

9.47

PB Ratio

LEU:

4.74

POWL:

15.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEU:

$452.30M

POWL:

$1.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEU:

$116.10M

POWL:

$340.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

LEU:

$70.50M

POWL:

$236.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEU vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEU
LEU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

POWL
POWL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
POWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
POWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEU vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEUPOWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.62

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

11.83

-11.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

37.87

-37.48

LEU vs. POWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEU Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the POWL Sharpe Ratio of 6.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEU and POWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEUPOWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

6.24

-6.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.48

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.75

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.29

-0.39

Drawdowns

LEU vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than POWL's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and POWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEUPOWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-73.10%

-26.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.89%

-30.88%

-32.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.89%

-55.76%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.23%

-55.76%

-22.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.84%

-68.85%

-14.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.58%

-8.80%

-88.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.98%

-36.11%

-37.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.75%

9.63%

+28.12%

Volatility

LEU vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison

Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 22.37% compared to Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) at 15.85%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEUPOWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.37%

15.85%

+6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.68%

42.91%

+22.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.10%

58.63%

+32.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.24%

64.11%

+22.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.26%

54.69%

+27.57%

Dividends

LEU vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison

LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
0.12%0.34%0.48%1.19%2.96%3.53%3.53%2.12%4.16%3.63%2.67%4.00%

Financials

LEU vs. POWL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centrus Energy Corp. and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
76.70M
296.62M
(LEU) Total Revenue
(POWL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEU vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Centrus Energy Corp. and Powell Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
41.1%
29.7%
Portfolio components
LEU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.50M and revenue of 76.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.

POWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

LEU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported an operating income of 800.00K and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

POWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

LEU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a net income of 10.00M and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

POWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LEU and POWL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEU has higher volatility (22.37%) compared to POWL (15.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEU dropped -99.98% vs POWL's -73.10%.

POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.24 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEU and POWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer