LEU vs. IBKR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LEU (Centrus Energy Corp.) and IBKR (Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.) are both stocks. LEU operates in Uranium (Energy), while IBKR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LEU returned 47.52%/yr vs 26.54%/yr for IBKR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LEU vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a -33.03% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 41.50% return. Over the past 10 years, LEU has outperformed IBKR with an annualized return of 47.52%, while IBKR has yielded a comparatively lower 26.54% annualized return.

LEU

• 1D: 2.46%
• 1M: -10.96%
• YTD: -33.03%
• 6M: -34.71%
• 1Y: 0.21%
• 3Y*: 68.75%
• 5Y*: 43.53%
• 10Y*: 47.52%

IBKR

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: 41.50%
• 6M: 41.85%
• 1Y: 80.51%
• 3Y*: 67.33%
• 5Y*: 41.64%
• 10Y*: 26.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEU vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEU Centrus Energy Corp.	-33.03%	264.45%	22.42%	67.52%	-34.92%	115.78%	236.19%	307.10%	-57.86%	-37.15%
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.	41.50%	46.37%	114.43%	15.14%	-8.35%	31.12%	31.71%	-14.01%	-7.13%	63.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LEU and IBKR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007	0.22

Over the past year, LEU and IBKR have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LEU : $3.65B IBKR : $40.72B
EPS LEU : $2.89 IBKR : $3.76
PE Ratio LEU : 56.19 IBKR : 24.18
PS Ratio LEU : 7.53 IBKR : 4.66
PB Ratio LEU : 4.71 IBKR : 1.92
Total Revenue (TTM) LEU : $452.30M IBKR : $8.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) LEU : $116.10M IBKR : $7.75B
EBITDA (TTM) LEU : $70.50M IBKR : $7.07B

Return for Risk

LEU vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEU

LEU Risk / Return Rank: 45
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 43

IBKR

IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 88
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEU vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LEU	IBKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	2.08	-2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	2.67	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.33	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	4.20	-4.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.07	10.65	-10.59

LEU vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEU Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEU and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LEU vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and IBKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEU	IBKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-63.66%	-36.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.37%	-18.70%	-47.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.37%	-38.66%	-27.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.23%	-38.66%	-39.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.84%	-55.09%	-28.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.60%	0.00%	-97.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.98%	-24.85%	-49.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.60%	7.35%	+31.25%

Volatility

LEU vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 24.20% compared to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 11.31%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEU	IBKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.20%	11.31%	+12.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.53%	27.82%	+38.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.26%	37.67%	+53.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.35%	34.50%	+51.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.30%	33.37%	+48.93%

Dividends

LEU vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.	0.36%	0.47%	0.48%	0.48%	0.55%	0.50%	0.66%	0.86%	0.73%	0.68%	1.10%	0.92%
LEU Centrus Energy Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEU and IBKR in my portfolio?

LEU and IBKR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEU or IBKR?

LEU has higher volatility (24.20%) compared to IBKR (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEU dropped -99.98% vs IBKR's -63.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.