PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEU vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEU vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a -21.16% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's -11.31% return.


LEU

1D
12.38%
1M
6.71%
YTD
-21.16%
6M
-26.89%
1Y
0.71%
3Y*
75.51%
5Y*
47.87%
10Y*
49.29%

GDMN

1D
-2.56%
1M
-10.55%
YTD
-11.31%
6M
-13.58%
1Y
65.62%
3Y*
56.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEU vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
-21.16%264.45%22.42%67.52%-34.92%1.26%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-11.31%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LEU and GDMN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.24

The correlation between LEU and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEU vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEU
LEU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEU vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEUGDMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

1.31

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

3.42

-3.28

LEU vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEU Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEU and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEU vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEUGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-52.82%

-47.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.37%

-48.76%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.37%

-48.76%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.17%

-41.78%

-55.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.99%

-19.09%

-54.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.33%

18.58%

+20.75%

Volatility

LEU vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 28.22% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) at 22.11%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEUGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.22%

22.11%

+6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.24%

54.94%

+12.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.58%

63.83%

+28.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.63%

48.18%

+38.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.45%

48.18%

+34.27%

Dividends

LEU vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
3.05%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEU and GDMN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEU has higher volatility (28.22%) compared to GDMN (22.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEU dropped -99.98% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEU and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer