PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEMV.L achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 11.99% return.


LEMV.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.75%
6M
5.46%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
7.82%

UD03.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.74%
YTD
11.99%
6M
14.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LEMV.L
Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)
3.75%17.91%9.36%4.61%-9.18%15.18%6.43%1.64%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
11.99%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LEMV.L and UD03.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.23

Over the past year, LEMV.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LEMV.L
UD03.L

Utilities

20.2%
7.7%

Industrials

18.7%
12.1%

Financial Services

17.1%
28.5%

Communication Services

16.5%
3.1%

Real Estate

11.6%

-

Technology

9.8%
16.2%

Energy

2.2%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%
7.0%

Healthcare

1.3%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
14.6%

Basic Materials

0.4%
4.2%

Utilities

LEMV.L
20.2%
UD03.L
7.7%

Industrials

LEMV.L
18.7%
UD03.L
12.1%

Financial Services

LEMV.L
17.1%
UD03.L
28.5%

Communication Services

LEMV.L
16.5%
UD03.L
3.1%

Real Estate

LEMV.L
11.6%
UD03.L

-

Technology

LEMV.L
9.8%
UD03.L
16.2%

Energy

LEMV.L
2.2%
UD03.L
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

LEMV.L
2.1%
UD03.L
7.0%

Healthcare

LEMV.L
1.3%
UD03.L
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

LEMV.L
1.1%
UD03.L
14.6%

Basic Materials

LEMV.L
0.4%
UD03.L
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEMV.L
LEMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
LEMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LEMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEMV.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.61

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

5.67

-4.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

16.11

-13.67

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEMV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEMV.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEMV.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

3.44

-2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.74

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.19

-0.50

Drawdowns

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEMV.L drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMV.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEMV.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

-30.85%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-9.80%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

-11.72%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-18.67%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.90%

-1.45%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-3.32%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.56%

-0.87%

Volatility

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) is 2.82%, while UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that LEMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEMV.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.69%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

16.20%

-5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

27.51%

-15.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.49%

47.36%

-34.87%

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEMV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

LEMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LEMV.L
Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.55%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEMV.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LEMV.L.

LEMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LEMV.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEMV.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer