LEMV.L vs. UD03.L
LEMV.L (Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)) and UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) are both Europe Equities funds - LEMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while UD03.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEMV.L returned 6.86%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for UD03.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LEMV.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for UD03.L.
Performance
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEMV.L achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 11.99% return.
LEMV.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
UD03.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- —
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 3.75% | 17.91% | 9.36% | 4.61% | -9.18% | 15.18% | 6.43% | 1.64% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 11.99% | 25.20% | 0.78% | 19.24% | -4.62% | 10.81% | 5.72% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEMV.L and UD03.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, LEMV.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Utilities
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Industrials
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Financial Services
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Communication Services
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Real Estate
LEMV.L
UD03.L
-
Technology
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Energy
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Consumer Cyclical
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Healthcare
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Consumer Defensive
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Basic Materials
LEMV.L
UD03.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEMV.L
UD03.L
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEMV.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.61 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 5.67 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 16.11 | -13.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEMV.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 3.44 | -2.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.74 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.19 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEMV.L drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMV.L and UD03.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEMV.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -30.85% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -9.80% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -11.72% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -18.67% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -1.45% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -3.32% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.56% | -0.87% |
Volatility
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) is 2.82%, while UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that LEMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEMV.L | UD03.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 3.69% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 16.20% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 27.51% | -15.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 47.36% | -34.87% |
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEMV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEMV.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison
LEMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.55% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEMV.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LEMV.L.
LEMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LEMV.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.
Find the right allocation for LEMV.L and UD03.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer