LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L
LEMV.L (Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - LEMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while LCUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEMV.L returned 6.86%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for LCUK.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEMV.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.
Performance
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LEMV.L is traded in GBp, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEMV.L achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than LCUK.L's 5.93% return.
LEMV.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
LCUK.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 3.75% | 17.91% | 9.36% | 4.61% | -9.18% | 15.18% | 6.43% | 12.42% | 1.66% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.93% | 21.01% | 9.05% | 7.25% | 2.15% | 18.06% | -11.83% | 18.73% | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEMV.L and LCUK.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between LEMV.L and LCUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Utilities
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Industrials
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Financial Services
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Communication Services
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Real Estate
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Technology
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Energy
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Healthcare
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Defensive
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Basic Materials
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEMV.L
LCUK.L
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEMV.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.25 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.80 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | 5.79 | -3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEMV.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.38 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.77 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.51 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEMV.L drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMV.L and LCUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEMV.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -35.54% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -9.13% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.93% | -12.65% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -12.65% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -3.98% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -4.97% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.85% | -0.16% |
Volatility
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (LEMV.L) is 2.82%, while Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that LEMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEMV.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 3.76% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 10.20% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 11.92% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 12.97% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 15.69% | -3.20% |
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEMV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEMV.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LEMV.L nor LCUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 3.94% | 3.86% | 3.00% | 3.48% |
LEMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEMV.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LEMV.L.
LEMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LEMV.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.
Find the right allocation for LEMV.L and LCUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer