LEML.L vs. HEMC.L
LEML.L (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD) and HEMC.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Amundi and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LEML.L returned 20.41%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for HEMC.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LEML.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HEMC.L.
Performance
LEML.L vs. HEMC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LEML.L is traded in GBp, while HEMC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HEMC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LEML.L having a 25.85% return and HEMC.L slightly higher at 26.32%.
LEML.L
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 25.85%
- 6M
- 27.98%
- 1Y
- 53.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
HEMC.L
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 26.32%
- 6M
- 28.17%
- 1Y
- 54.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEML.L vs. HEMC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEML.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD | 25.85% | 24.60% | 8.72% | 2.68% | -3.19% |
HEMC.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 26.32% | 24.74% | 8.89% | 2.36% | -2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEML.L and HEMC.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.99 |
The correlation between LEML.L and HEMC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEML.L vs. HEMC.L — Risk / Return Rank
LEML.L
HEMC.L
LEML.L vs. HEMC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEML.L | HEMC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.59 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 4.98 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.96 | 17.55 | -0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEML.L | HEMC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 3.19 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.95 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
LEML.L vs. HEMC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEML.L drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, which is greater than HEMC.L's maximum drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEML.L and HEMC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEML.L | HEMC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.91% | -15.14% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -10.83% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.34% | -15.14% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -2.51% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.48% | -4.25% | -6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.08% | +0.05% |
Volatility
LEML.L vs. HEMC.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) have volatilities of 7.42% and 7.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEML.L | HEMC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 7.44% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 14.44% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 16.93% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 15.44% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 15.44% | +2.50% |
LEML.L vs. HEMC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEML.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HEMC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEML.L vs. HEMC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LEML.L nor HEMC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, LEML.L and HEMC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HEMC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEMC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LEML.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LEML.L and 0.15% for HEMC.L.
Find the right allocation for LEML.L and HEMC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer