PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEML.L vs. CW8G.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEML.L achieves a 25.85% return, which is significantly higher than CW8G.L's 9.97% return. Over the past 10 years, LEML.L has underperformed CW8G.L with an annualized return of 10.54%, while CW8G.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.68% annualized return.


LEML.L

1D
-1.66%
1M
6.29%
YTD
25.85%
6M
27.98%
1Y
53.27%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
10.54%

CW8G.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.16%
YTD
9.97%
6M
10.16%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEML.L
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD
25.85%24.60%8.72%2.68%-10.69%-1.92%13.57%13.03%-9.98%24.60%
CW8G.L
Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD
9.97%12.11%20.95%17.29%-8.45%23.58%11.88%23.12%-4.09%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LEML.L and CW8G.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.68

The correlation between LEML.L and CW8G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LEML.L
CW8G.L

Technology

36.9%
28.3%

Financial Services

19.5%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.3%

Industrials

7.5%
11.4%

Communication Services

6.9%
9.3%

Basic Materials

6.6%
3.3%

Energy

4.1%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
5.2%

Healthcare

2.9%
8.8%

Utilities

2.1%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.9%

Technology

LEML.L
36.9%
CW8G.L
28.3%

Financial Services

LEML.L
19.5%
CW8G.L
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

LEML.L
9.6%
CW8G.L
9.3%

Industrials

LEML.L
7.5%
CW8G.L
11.4%

Communication Services

LEML.L
6.9%
CW8G.L
9.3%

Basic Materials

LEML.L
6.6%
CW8G.L
3.3%

Energy

LEML.L
4.1%
CW8G.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

LEML.L
3.0%
CW8G.L
5.2%

Healthcare

LEML.L
2.9%
CW8G.L
8.8%

Utilities

LEML.L
2.1%
CW8G.L
2.7%

Real Estate

LEML.L
1.0%
CW8G.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEML.L
LEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CW8G.L
CW8G.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CW8G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW8G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEML.LCW8G.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.51

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

4.00

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

15.91

+1.05

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEML.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the CW8G.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEML.L and CW8G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEML.LCW8G.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

2.74

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.97

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.95

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.99

-0.57

Drawdowns

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEML.L drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, which is greater than CW8G.L's maximum drawdown of -25.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEML.L and CW8G.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEML.LCW8G.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.91%

-25.60%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-6.67%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-18.88%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-18.88%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.59%

-25.60%

-1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-0.15%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.48%

-3.10%

-7.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.68%

+1.45%

Volatility

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF - Acc USD (LEML.L) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) at 2.55%. This indicates that LEML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW8G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEML.LCW8G.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

2.55%

+4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

7.27%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

9.75%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

13.21%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

14.45%

+3.49%

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEML.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CW8G.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEML.L vs. CW8G.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LEML.L nor CW8G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LEML.L and CW8G.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CW8G.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CW8G.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LEML.L.

LEML.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CW8G.L is Global Equities. LEML.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while CW8G.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LEML.L and 0.28% for CW8G.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEML.L and CW8G.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer