PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEMB vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEMB vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEMB achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


LEMB

1D
-0.57%
1M
1.13%
YTD
1.19%
6M
2.18%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
1.37%

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEMB vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
1.19%18.02%-0.03%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
62.18%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LEMB and USOY is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.15

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LEMB and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.15 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEMB vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEMB
LEMB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEMB vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LEMBUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

4.03

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

7.74

-2.16

LEMB vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEMB and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LEMBUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.89

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.99

-0.94

Drawdowns

LEMB vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMB and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEMBUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-17.46%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-14.29%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-5.11%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-6.47%

-6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

7.42%

-5.66%

Volatility

LEMB vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) is 2.09%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that LEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEMBUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

11.62%

-9.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.34%

27.18%

-21.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.54%

30.44%

-23.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.24%

26.13%

-17.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.29%

26.13%

-16.84%

LEMB vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEMB vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

LEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
2.41%2.44%0.00%1.34%0.86%3.89%0.00%4.39%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.64%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEMB and USOY have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to LEMB (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEMB dropped -30.82% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 57.29% vs 9.81% for LEMB. On fees, LEMB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, LEMB has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 57.29% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LEMB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 2.41% for LEMB.

LEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LEMB and 1.22% for USOY.

USOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEMB and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer