PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEMB vs. JPMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEMB vs. JPMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEMB achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than JPMB's 1.19% return.


LEMB

1D
0.16%
1M
0.21%
6M
0.59%
YTD
2.60%
1Y
8.68%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
1.01%
ALL TIME*
0.52%

JPMB

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.07%
6M
1.04%
YTD
1.19%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$303.80K$418.69K$322.67K
$8.99M$7.31M$6.57M

LEMB vs. JPMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
2.60%18.02%-1.72%7.23%-10.74%-9.92%3.10%6.40%-10.76%
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
1.19%13.73%1.46%9.48%-16.05%-2.26%5.36%17.71%-4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LEMB and JPMB is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018

0.55

The correlation between LEMB and JPMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEMB vs. JPMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LEMB
LEMB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JPMB
JPMB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
JPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LEMB vs. JPMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEMBJPMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.55

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

6.30

-1.65

LEMB vs. JPMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the JPMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEMB and JPMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEMB vs. JPMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, which is greater than JPMB's maximum drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEMB and JPMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEMBJPMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-26.33%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-4.61%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.08%

-6.63%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.89%

-26.16%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-1.28%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-6.94%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.13%

+0.74%

Volatility

LEMB vs. JPMB - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) at 1.34%. This indicates that LEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEMBJPMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.34%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

4.64%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.59%

5.41%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.25%

8.95%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.16%

9.58%

-0.42%

LEMB vs. JPMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JPMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEMB vs. JPMB - Dividend Comparison

LEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than JPMB's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
5.88%6.71%6.32%5.99%4.94%4.29%4.29%4.51%4.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
2.38%2.44%0.00%1.34%0.86%3.89%0.00%4.39%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEMB and JPMB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEMB has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to JPMB (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEMB dropped -30.82% vs JPMB's -26.33%.

On 5-year performance, LEMB leads with 1.35% vs 1.13% for JPMB. On fees, LEMB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LEMB has performed better with a 1.35% return vs 1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LEMB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JPMB.

JPMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 2.38% for LEMB.

LEMB tracks J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global 15 cap 4.5 floor, while JPMB tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LEMB and 0.39% for JPMB.

LEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEMB and JPMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer