PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEGN vs. GSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LEGN vs. GSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) and GSK plc (GSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEGN achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly higher than GSK's 9.35% return.


LEGN

1D
-1.10%
1M
-24.51%
6M
14.75%
YTD
24.56%
1Y
-30.49%
3Y*
-27.72%
5Y*
-7.67%
10Y*

GSK

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.49%
6M
6.42%
YTD
9.35%
1Y
42.87%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
4.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEGN vs. GSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LEGN
Legend Biotech Corporation
24.56%-33.19%-45.92%20.53%7.10%65.52%-23.89%
GSK
GSK plc
9.35%51.23%-5.14%9.71%-33.41%26.74%-9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LEGN and GSK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEGN:

$5.01B

GSK:

$105.71B

EPS

LEGN:

-$1.63

GSK:

£2.85

PS Ratio

LEGN:

3.65

GSK:

2.45

PB Ratio

LEGN:

2.59

GSK:

3.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEGN:

$1.14B

GSK:

£32.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEGN:

$611.63M

GSK:

£23.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEGN:

-$186.04M

GSK:

£11.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEGN vs. GSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEGN
LEGN Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LEGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GSK
GSK Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSK Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEGN vs. GSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) and GSK plc (GSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEGNGSKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.25

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

2.06

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.78

4.87

-5.66

LEGN vs. GSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEGN Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the GSK Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEGN and GSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEGN vs. GSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEGN drawdown since its inception was -78.24%, which is greater than GSK's maximum drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGN and GSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGNGSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.24%

-55.70%

-22.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.43%

-18.63%

-43.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.24%

-28.46%

-49.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.24%

-50.10%

-28.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.60%

-12.35%

-52.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.78%

-18.86%

-12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.62%

7.96%

+32.66%

Volatility

LEGN vs. GSK - Volatility Comparison

Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) has a higher volatility of 22.64% compared to GSK plc (GSK) at 8.25%. This indicates that LEGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGNGSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.64%

8.25%

+14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.26%

19.50%

+40.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.14%

27.25%

+42.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.80%

25.25%

+31.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.99%

22.89%

+33.10%

Dividends

LEGN vs. GSK - Dividend Comparison

LEGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSK
GSK plc
3.28%3.42%4.60%3.75%5.47%4.99%5.59%4.35%5.65%5.83%6.86%5.93%
LEGN
Legend Biotech Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LEGN vs. GSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Legend Biotech Corporation and GSK plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
306.01M
7.63B
(LEGN) Total Revenue
(GSK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LEGN values in USD, GSK values in GBP

LEGN vs. GSK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Legend Biotech Corporation and GSK plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
37.2%
75.4%
Portfolio components
LEGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Legend Biotech Corporation reported a gross profit of 113.94M and revenue of 306.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.

GSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GSK plc reported a gross profit of 5.75B and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.4%.

LEGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Legend Biotech Corporation reported an operating income of -47.04M and revenue of 306.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -15.4%.

GSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GSK plc reported an operating income of 2.29B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

LEGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Legend Biotech Corporation reported a net income of -54.46M and revenue of 306.01M, resulting in a net margin of -17.8%.

GSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GSK plc reported a net income of 1.74B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LEGN and GSK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEGN has higher volatility (22.64%) compared to GSK (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGN dropped -78.24% vs GSK's -55.70%.

GSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEGN and GSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer