PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEG vs. MZTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LEG vs. MZTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and The Marzetti Company (MZTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -10.05% return, which is significantly higher than MZTI's -33.98% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed MZTI with an annualized return of -12.01%, while MZTI has yielded a comparatively higher 0.09% annualized return.


LEG

1D
-2.20%
1M
-16.02%
6M
-15.21%
YTD
-10.05%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
-29.16%
5Y*
-24.27%
10Y*
-12.01%
ALL TIME*
6.33%

MZTI

1D
-0.69%
1M
-7.99%
6M
-36.74%
YTD
-33.98%
1Y
-38.25%
3Y*
-15.91%
5Y*
-9.69%
10Y*
0.09%
ALL TIME*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.50M$23.27M$28.03M
$30.94M$31.42M$39.50M

LEG vs. MZTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
-10.05%17.02%-61.93%-13.45%-17.78%-3.76%-9.05%47.13%-22.25%0.58%
MZTI
The Marzetti Company
-33.98%-2.93%6.10%-14.02%21.59%-8.26%16.75%-7.88%39.22%-6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LEG and MZTI is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEG:

$1.34B

MZTI:

$2.93B

EPS

LEG:

$1.60

MZTI:

$6.41

PE Ratio

LEG:

6.13

MZTI:

16.67

PS Ratio

LEG:

0.45

MZTI:

1.51

PB Ratio

LEG:

1.33

MZTI:

2.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEG:

$3.03B

MZTI:

$1.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEG:

$717.40M

MZTI:

$469.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

LEG:

$433.10M

MZTI:

$296.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEG vs. MZTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LEG
LEG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MZTI
MZTI Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MZTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MZTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MZTI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MZTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MZTI Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LEG vs. MZTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and The Marzetti Company (MZTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEGMZTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.76

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

-0.89

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

-1.63

+1.97

LEG vs. MZTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEG Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the MZTI Sharpe Ratio of -1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEG and MZTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEG vs. MZTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than MZTI's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and MZTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEGMZTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.41%

-54.66%

-31.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.51%

-43.14%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.68%

-46.85%

-29.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.29%

-48.59%

-35.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.41%

-48.59%

-37.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.20%

-47.53%

-31.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.84%

-11.79%

-8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.72%

23.48%

-9.76%

Volatility

LEG vs. MZTI - Volatility Comparison

Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and The Marzetti Company (MZTI) have volatilities of 11.32% and 11.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEGMZTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.32%

11.06%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.38%

23.64%

+8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.36%

28.78%

+20.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.74%

28.28%

+14.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.96%

27.98%

+11.98%

Dividends

LEG vs. MZTI - Dividend Comparison

LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than MZTI's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
2.04%1.82%6.35%6.95%5.40%4.03%3.61%3.11%4.19%2.98%2.74%3.00%
MZTI
The Marzetti Company
3.70%2.34%2.11%2.07%1.65%1.84%1.55%1.66%1.39%1.74%1.45%5.96%

Financials

LEG vs. MZTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and The Marzetti Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LEG and MZTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEG has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to MZTI (11.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs MZTI's -54.66%.

LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEG and MZTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer