PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LEER.DE is traded in EUR, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEER.DE achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LEER.DE has outperformed TDGB.L with an annualized return of 11.69%, while TDGB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.


LEER.DE

1D
3.17%
1M
5.04%
YTD
19.93%
6M
24.39%
1Y
46.18%
3Y*
31.60%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
11.69%

TDGB.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.32%
YTD
11.53%
6M
13.60%
1Y
27.54%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
19.93%53.95%4.13%41.71%-21.18%20.41%-18.42%1.30%-8.37%30.59%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
11.53%24.07%16.00%11.35%16.18%27.37%-10.74%10.49%-9.11%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LEER.DE and TDGB.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEER.DE
LEER.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEER.DETDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.55

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

8.17

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

23.41

-10.71

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEER.DE and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEER.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.75%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -38.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEER.DE and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEER.DETDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.75%

-38.08%

-31.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-3.36%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-14.51%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.51%

-14.51%

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.74%

-38.08%

-10.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-6.41%

-24.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

1.17%

+2.46%

Volatility

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 1.98%. This indicates that LEER.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEER.DETDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

1.98%

+4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

6.86%

+10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

9.41%

+11.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

12.02%

+11.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

15.65%

+6.20%

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEER.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEER.DE vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

LEER.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.16%3.50%4.26%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%4.38%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEER.DE and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDGB.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDGB.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for LEER.DE.

LEER.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. LEER.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for LEER.DE and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEER.DE and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer