LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE
LEER.DE (Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LEER.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index, while LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LEER.DE returned 10.92%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for LOGS.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LEER.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.
Performance
LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEER.DE achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly lower than LOGS.DE's 31.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LEER.DE has underperformed LOGS.DE with an annualized return of 10.92%, while LOGS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
LEER.DE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 25.17%
- 1Y
- 42.24%
- 3Y*
- 31.18%
- 5Y*
- 16.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEER.DE Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF | 18.03% | 53.92% | 4.11% | 41.71% | -21.16% | 20.40% | -18.41% | 1.33% | -8.39% | 30.82% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEER.DE and LOGS.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2007 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LEER.DE and LOGS.DE has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LEER.DE
LOGS.DE
LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEER.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.62 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 9.83 | -5.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.61 | 34.29 | -22.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEER.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 3.73 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.98 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.24 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEER.DE drawdown since its inception was -72.16%, which is greater than LOGS.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEER.DE and LOGS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEER.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.16% | -56.42% | -15.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -6.50% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -21.16% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.49% | -21.16% | -22.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.74% | -56.42% | +7.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -4.69% | +3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -15.22% | -18.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 1.87% | +1.76% |
Volatility
LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) have volatilities of 6.19% and 6.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEER.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 6.06% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 13.34% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.00% | 17.18% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 21.72% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 24.09% | -2.12% |
LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEER.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEER.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LEER.DE nor LOGS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEER.DE and LOGS.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for LEER.DE.
LEER.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LOGS.DE is Energy Equities. LEER.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for LEER.DE and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
Find the right allocation for LEER.DE and LOGS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer