PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEER.DE achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, LEER.DE has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 11.69%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.92% annualized return.


LEER.DE

1D
3.17%
1M
5.04%
YTD
19.93%
6M
24.39%
1Y
46.18%
3Y*
31.60%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
11.69%

CSH.PA

1D
0.01%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.94%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
2.96%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
0.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
19.93%53.95%4.13%41.71%-21.18%20.41%-18.42%1.30%-8.37%30.59%
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.78%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.06%-0.65%1.93%-0.61%-0.55%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LEER.DE and CSH.PA is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEER.DE
LEER.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEER.DECSH.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.96

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

11.24

-6.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

57.34

-44.64

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEER.DE and CSH.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEER.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.75%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -3.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEER.DE and CSH.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEER.DECSH.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.75%

-3.73%

-66.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-0.18%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-0.18%

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.51%

-0.75%

-42.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.74%

-2.26%

-46.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-1.04%

-29.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

0.03%

+3.60%

Volatility

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 0.09%. This indicates that LEER.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEER.DECSH.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

0.09%

+6.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

0.41%

+16.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

0.50%

+20.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

0.35%

+22.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

0.64%

+21.21%

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEER.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

LEER.DE vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither LEER.DE nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%2.60%
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEER.DE and CSH.PA have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for LEER.DE.

LEER.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CSH.PA is Money Market. LEER.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for LEER.DE and 0.10% for CSH.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEER.DE and CSH.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer