LDUR vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LDUR (PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LDUR is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. LDUR is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LDUR returned 5.11%/yr vs 16.90%/yr for CMDT. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. LDUR charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

LDUR vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDUR achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 23.96% return.

LDUR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: 2.23%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

CMDT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 23.96%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 35.85%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDUR vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF	0.91%	5.76%	5.14%	2.92%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	23.96%	12.78%	6.93%	5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between LDUR and CMDT is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	-0.07

The correlation between LDUR and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LDUR vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDUR

LDUR Risk / Return Rank: 88
LDUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LDUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LDUR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LDUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
LDUR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 88
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDUR vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDUR	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	2.92	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.32	3.92	+0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.50	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.70	8.03	-3.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.64	22.12	+0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDUR vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDUR Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDUR and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDUR	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83	2.92	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.32	-0.45

Drawdowns

LDUR vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDUR drawdown since its inception was -8.68%, smaller than the maximum CMDT drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUR and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDUR	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.68%	-9.69%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.93%	-4.49%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.17%	-9.69%	+8.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-2.86%	+2.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-2.69%	+1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.19%	1.63%	-1.44%

Volatility

LDUR vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) is 0.44%, while PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that LDUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDUR	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	4.33%	-3.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.08%	10.30%	-9.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55%	12.35%	-10.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.03%	12.21%	-10.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.77%	12.21%	-9.44%

LDUR vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDUR has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDUR vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

LDUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than CMDT's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.44%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF	4.35%	4.60%	4.77%	4.11%	2.22%	0.90%	2.15%	3.14%	2.66%	2.08%	1.85%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDUR and CMDT in my portfolio?

LDUR and CMDT have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDUR or CMDT?

CMDT has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to LDUR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDUR dropped -8.68% vs CMDT's -9.69%.

Which ETF is better, LDUR or CMDT?

On 3-year performance, CMDT leads with 16.90% vs 5.11% for LDUR. On fees, LDUR is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, LDUR has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LDUR or CMDT?

Over the 3-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 16.90% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDUR or CMDT?

LDUR is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LDUR or CMDT?

LDUR has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 2.44% for CMDT.

What is the main difference between LDUR and CMDT?

LDUR is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CMDT is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for LDUR and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.