LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L
LDUK.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF) and LDGG.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - LDUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while LDGG.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDUK.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for LDGG.L.
Performance
LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LDUK.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 1Y
- 16.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- —
LDGG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 8,184.24%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LDUK.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF | 4.91% |
LDGG.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8,270.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDUK.L and LDGG.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDUK.L
LDGG.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDUK.L | LDGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDUK.L drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, which is greater than LDGG.L's maximum drawdown of -8.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUK.L and LDGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDUK.L | LDGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.23% | -8.51% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.18% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -2.19% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | — | — |
Volatility
LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDUK.L | LDGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 10,399.82% | -10,384.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 10,399.82% | -10,384.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 10,399.82% | -10,384.72% |
LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDUK.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LDGG.L's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDUK.L vs. LDGG.L - Dividend Comparison
LDUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than LDGG.L's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDGG.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDUK.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF | 4.67% | 4.87% | 4.43% | 5.14% | 5.87% | 4.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDUK.L and LDGG.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDUK.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDUK.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for LDGG.L.
LDUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while LDGG.L is Global Equity Income. LDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while LDGG.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDUK.L and 0.31% for LDGG.L.
Find the right allocation for LDUK.L and LDGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer