LDGG.L vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LDGG.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDGG.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDGG.L charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.

Performance

LDGG.L vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDGG.L) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LDGG.L is traded in GBp, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

LDGG.L

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 19.45%
• 6M: 17.97%
• 1Y: 29.08%
• 3Y*: 12.42%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: 13.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDGG.L vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LDGG.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	9.22%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	14.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LDGG.L and SCHD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026	0.38

Return for Risk

LDGG.L vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 85
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDGG.L vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDGG.L) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDGG.L	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.43	0.91	+1.51

Drawdowns

LDGG.L vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDGG.L drawdown since its inception was -8.72%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDGG.L and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDGG.L	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.72%	-24.95%	+16.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-1.34%	+0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-3.74%	+1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LDGG.L	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.47%	11.47%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.47%	13.89%	-2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.47%	17.17%	-5.70%

LDGG.L vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDGG.L has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDGG.L vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

LDGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LDGG.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.24%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDGG.L and SCHD in my portfolio?

LDGG.L and SCHD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LDGG.L or SCHD?

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDGG.L or SCHD?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for LDGG.L.

What is the main difference between LDGG.L and SCHD?

LDGG.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while SCHD is Dividend. LDGG.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for LDGG.L and 0.06% for SCHD.