PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LDUK.L is traded in GBp, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDUK.L achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than LCUK.L's 5.93% return.


LDUK.L

1D
0.72%
1M
4.03%
YTD
3.01%
6M
7.64%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*

LCUK.L

1D
0.54%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.93%
6M
5.05%
1Y
16.53%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDUK.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF
3.01%22.62%16.13%8.22%-3.33%6.07%
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
5.93%21.01%9.05%7.25%2.15%9.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LDUK.L and LCUK.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.70

The correlation between LDUK.L and LCUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDUK.L
LCUK.L

Financial Services

60.4%
24.2%

Industrials

14.3%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
13.7%

Basic Materials

6.8%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
5.2%

Communication Services

1.1%
3.0%

Utilities

1.0%
5.1%

Technology

0.1%
0.9%

Energy

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

13.2%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Financial Services

LDUK.L
60.4%
LCUK.L
24.2%

Industrials

LDUK.L
14.3%
LCUK.L
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

LDUK.L
11.3%
LCUK.L
13.7%

Basic Materials

LDUK.L
6.8%
LCUK.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LDUK.L
5.0%
LCUK.L
5.2%

Communication Services

LDUK.L
1.1%
LCUK.L
3.0%

Utilities

LDUK.L
1.0%
LCUK.L
5.1%

Technology

LDUK.L
0.1%
LCUK.L
0.9%

Energy

LDUK.L

-

LCUK.L
11.1%

Healthcare

LDUK.L

-

LCUK.L
13.2%

Real Estate

LDUK.L

-

LCUK.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDUK.L
LDUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUK.L
LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDUK.LLCUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.80

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

5.79

-1.73

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDUK.L and LCUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDUK.LLCUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.38

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.77

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.51

+0.25

Drawdowns

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDUK.L drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUK.L and LCUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDUK.LLCUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-35.54%

+18.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-9.13%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

-12.65%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.13%

-12.65%

-4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-3.98%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-4.97%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.85%

+0.30%

Volatility

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) at 3.76%. This indicates that LDUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDUK.LLCUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

3.76%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

10.20%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

11.92%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

12.97%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

15.69%

-0.05%

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDUK.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison

LDUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while LCUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%3.68%3.05%3.94%3.86%3.00%3.48%
LDUK.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF
4.79%4.87%4.43%5.14%5.87%4.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDUK.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDUK.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDUK.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDUK.L and LCUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer