PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LDUK.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF) and IEVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating) are both Europe Equities funds - LDUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while IEVL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDUK.L returned 9.34%/yr vs 14.64%/yr for IEVL.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LDUK.L is traded in GBp, while IEVL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEVL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDUK.L achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than IEVL.L's 13.11% return.

LDUK.L

1D
0.72%
1M
4.03%
YTD
3.01%
6M
7.64%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
—

IEVL.L

1D
0.17%
1M
4.83%
YTD
13.11%
6M
15.93%
1Y
36.39%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDUK.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF		3.01%22.62%16.13%8.22%-3.33%6.07%
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating		13.11%42.23%5.56%11.28%1.19%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LDUK.L and IEVL.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.63

The correlation between LDUK.L and IEVL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LDUK.L
IEVL.L

Financial Services

60.4%
22.6%

Industrials

14.3%
17.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
8.6%

Basic Materials

6.8%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
6.2%

Communication Services

1.1%
3.7%

Utilities

1.0%
4.5%

Technology

0.1%
12.2%

Energy

-

5.1%

Healthcare

-

12.3%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Financial Services

LDUK.L
60.4%
IEVL.L
22.6%

Industrials

LDUK.L
14.3%
IEVL.L
17.0%

Consumer Defensive

LDUK.L
11.3%
IEVL.L
8.6%

Basic Materials

LDUK.L
6.8%
IEVL.L
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LDUK.L
5.0%
IEVL.L
6.2%

Communication Services

LDUK.L
1.1%
IEVL.L
3.7%

Utilities

LDUK.L
1.0%
IEVL.L
4.5%

Technology

LDUK.L
0.1%
IEVL.L
12.2%

Energy

LDUK.L

-

IEVL.L
5.1%

Healthcare

LDUK.L

-

IEVL.L
12.3%

Real Estate

LDUK.L

-

IEVL.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating

Often compared with LDUK.L:
LDUK.L vs. LDEG.LLDUK.L vs. IUKD.LLDUK.L vs. HUKX.LLDUK.L vs. GGRP.LLDUK.L vs. SPYL.DELDUK.L vs. VUSA.DELDUK.L vs. XDEM.L
Often compared with IEVL.L:
IEVL.L vs. AINF.LIEVL.L vs. FBTU.LIEVL.L vs. IUCS.LIEVL.L vs. CSKR.LIEVL.L vs. 36BA.DEIEVL.L vs. IEMA.LIEVL.L vs. GLD

Return for Risk

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LDUK.L
LDUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
IEVL.L
IEVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LDUK.LIEVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.87
2.68

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.37
3.61

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.48

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.42

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

12.70

-8.64

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDUK.L and IEVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LDUK.LIEVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

2.68

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.96

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.69

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.58

+0.18

Drawdowns

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDUK.L drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum IEVL.L drawdown of -34.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDUK.L and IEVL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LDUK.LIEVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-34.82%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-10.59%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

-16.33%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.13%

-16.48%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.82%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-0.82%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-6.05%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.86%

+0.29%

Volatility

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LDUK.LIEVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

4.85%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

11.06%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

13.52%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

15.24%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

17.13%

-1.49%

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LDUK.L and IEVL.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LDUK.L vs. IEVL.L - Dividend Comparison

LDUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while IEVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDUK.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF		4.79%4.87%4.43%5.14%5.87%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

LDUK.L and IEVL.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDUK.L and IEVL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

LDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IEVL.L tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDUK.L and IEVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer