PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDSF vs. ISDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LDSF vs. ISDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Invesco Short Duration Bond ETF (ISDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LDSF vs. ISDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
-0.07%6.82%4.20%6.53%-0.35%
ISDB
Invesco Short Duration Bond ETF
0.15%6.23%5.35%5.17%0.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than ISDB's 0.15% return.


LDSF

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*

ISDB

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
0.15%
6M
1.63%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LDSF vs. ISDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ISDB's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LDSF vs. ISDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDSF
LDSF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ISDB
ISDB Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ISDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDSF vs. ISDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Invesco Short Duration Bond ETF (ISDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDSFISDBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

3.34

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

5.13

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.77

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

4.30

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.81

19.53

-6.72

LDSF vs. ISDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDSF Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the ISDB Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDSF and ISDB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDSFISDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

3.34

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

2.75

-1.96

Correlation

The correlation between LDSF and ISDB is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LDSF vs. ISDB - Dividend Comparison

LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than ISDB's 4.69% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
4.61%4.52%4.53%4.08%2.61%1.97%2.65%3.06%
ISDB
Invesco Short Duration Bond ETF
4.69%4.89%5.50%5.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LDSF vs. ISDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, which is greater than ISDB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and ISDB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LDSFISDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-1.83%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

-1.12%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.70%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-0.26%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.25%

+0.15%

Volatility

LDSF vs. ISDB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to Invesco Short Duration Bond ETF (ISDB) at 0.77%. This indicates that LDSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LDSFISDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.77%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

1.05%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

1.46%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

1.87%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.20%

1.87%

+1.33%