LDSF vs. DDV
LDSF (First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDSF is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by First Trust, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDSF charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
LDSF vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.29% return.
LDSF
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDSF vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 0.98% | 0.75% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.29% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDSF and DDV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDSF vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
LDSF
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LDSF vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDSF | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.89 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDSF vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDSF | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -1.92% | -6.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.16% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -0.35% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility
LDSF vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDSF | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05% | 2.68% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.09% | 2.68% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 2.68% | +0.49% |
LDSF vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDSF vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDSF First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF | 4.62% | 4.52% | 4.53% | 4.08% | 2.61% | 1.97% | 2.65% | 3.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDSF and DDV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for LDSF.
LDSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
LDSF is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for LDSF and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for LDSF and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer