PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRX vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRX vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRX achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.


LDRX

1D
-1.37%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
5.85%
6M
5.00%
1Y
22.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.44%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
23.52%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRX vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LDRX
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF
5.85%23.63%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.63%22.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LDRX and YCS is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRX vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRX
LDRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRX vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDRXYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

3.78

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

11.93

-3.11

LDRX vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRX and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDRX vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRX drawdown since its inception was -10.62%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRX and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRXYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-49.56%

+38.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-8.30%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-0.14%

-4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-19.87%

+18.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.65%

-0.04%

Volatility

LDRX vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that LDRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRXYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

2.25%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

12.19%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

16.93%

-3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

21.10%

-7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.39%

18.82%

-5.43%

LDRX vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDRX vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

LDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
LDRX
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF
1.24%1.19%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRX and YCS have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDRX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRX dropped -10.62% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 31.27% vs 22.92% for LDRX. On fees, LDRX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 31.27% return vs 22.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

LDRX has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

LDRX is categorized as Derivative Income, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LDRX and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRX and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer