PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRX vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRX vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRX achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


LDRX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.60%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.87%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRX vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDRX and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2025

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRX vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRX
LDRX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRX vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDRXOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.42

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

6.91

+5.39

LDRX vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRX and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDRXOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.06

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.60

0.12

+2.49

Drawdowns

LDRX vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRX drawdown since its inception was -10.62%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRX and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRXOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-83.76%

+73.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-17.35%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-3.66%

+2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-32.61%

+31.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

8.56%

-6.07%

Volatility

LDRX vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) is 3.23%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that LDRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRXOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

10.44%

-7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

23.26%

-13.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

28.75%

-16.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.85%

30.12%

-17.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.85%

35.97%

-23.12%

LDRX vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDRX vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

LDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDRX
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF
1.19%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRX and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to LDRX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRX dropped -10.62% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 30.54% for LDRX. On fees, LDRX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, LDRX has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 30.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.19% for LDRX.

LDRX is categorized as Derivative Income, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LDRX and 0.68% for OILK.

LDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRX and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer