LDOS vs. SLV
LDOS (Leidos Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, LDOS returned 14.90%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for SLV. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LDOS vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDOS achieves a -30.78% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 3.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LDOS having a 14.90% annualized return and SLV not far ahead at 15.63%.
LDOS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- -30.78%
- 6M
- -34.95%
- 1Y
- -12.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
SLV
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 113.72%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
LDOS vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | -30.78% | 26.50% | 34.52% | 4.50% | 20.04% | -14.20% | 8.95% | 88.82% | -16.72% | 29.14% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 3.97% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDOS and SLV is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2006 | 0.10 |
The correlation between LDOS and SLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDOS vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
LDOS
SLV
LDOS vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDOS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.36 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 2.69 | -3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 5.76 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDOS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 1.94 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.58 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.49 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.25 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
LDOS vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDOS drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDOS and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDOS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.72% | -76.28% | +21.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.05% | -42.45% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.05% | -42.45% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.05% | -42.45% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.29% | -42.81% | +0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.28% | -36.57% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.66% | -44.67% | +25.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.15% | 19.81% | -5.66% |
Volatility
LDOS vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is 7.62%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that LDOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDOS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 16.34% | -8.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.30% | 58.31% | -33.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.31% | 58.90% | -29.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.73% | 36.15% | -9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.49% | 31.83% | -4.34% |
Dividends
LDOS vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 1.33% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.35% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 29.17% | 3.41% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDOS and SLV have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to LDOS (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDOS dropped -54.72% vs SLV's -76.28%.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDOS and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer