LDOS vs. EVER
LDOS (Leidos Holdings, Inc.) and EVER (EverQuote, Inc.) are both stocks. LDOS operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while EVER operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, LDOS returned 5.48%/yr vs -9.85%/yr for EVER. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LDOS vs. EVER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LDOS having a -29.53% return and EVER slightly lower at -29.63%.
LDOS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -15.02%
- YTD
- -29.53%
- 6M
- -31.88%
- 1Y
- -9.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
EVER
- 1D
- -4.76%
- 1M
- 31.12%
- YTD
- -29.63%
- 6M
- -30.02%
- 1Y
- -20.54%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- -9.85%
- 10Y*
- —
LDOS vs. EVER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | -29.53% | 26.50% | 34.52% | 4.50% | 20.04% | -14.20% | 8.95% | 88.82% | -9.21% |
EVER EverQuote, Inc. | -29.63% | 35.07% | 63.32% | -16.96% | -5.87% | -58.07% | 8.73% | 721.77% | -76.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDOS and EVER is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
LDOS:
$16.23B
EVER:
$701.90M
LDOS:
$10.92
EVER:
$2.92
LDOS:
11.61
EVER:
6.50
LDOS:
0.10
EVER:
0.03
LDOS:
0.95
EVER:
1.00
LDOS:
$17.33B
EVER:
$716.74M
LDOS:
$3.04B
EVER:
$698.48M
LDOS:
$2.34B
EVER:
$78.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDOS vs. EVER — Risk / Return Rank
LDOS
EVER
LDOS vs. EVER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) and EverQuote, Inc. (EVER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDOS | EVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | -0.26 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | 0.08 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.01 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | -0.36 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | -0.70 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDOS | EVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | -0.26 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | -0.14 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.01 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
LDOS vs. EVER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDOS drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum EVER drawdown of -91.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDOS and EVER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDOS | EVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.72% | -91.18% | +36.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.05% | -48.80% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.05% | -51.97% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.05% | -84.02% | +45.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.14% | -69.74% | +33.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.66% | -57.60% | +37.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.76% | 24.93% | -11.17% |
Volatility
LDOS vs. EVER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is 10.71%, while EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) has a volatility of 53.58%. This indicates that LDOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDOS | EVER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 53.58% | -42.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.26% | 63.50% | -38.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.68% | 79.62% | -49.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 72.67% | -45.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.49% | 75.90% | -48.41% |
Dividends
LDOS vs. EVER - Dividend Comparison
LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while EVER has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVER EverQuote, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 1.31% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.35% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 29.17% | 3.41% |
Financials
LDOS vs. EVER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leidos Holdings, Inc. and EverQuote, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LDOS vs. EVER - Profitability Comparison
LDOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.
EVER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a gross profit of 186.59M and revenue of 190.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.8%.
LDOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 508.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
EVER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.42M and revenue of 190.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.
LDOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
EVER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EverQuote, Inc. reported a net income of 18.67M and revenue of 190.85M, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LDOS and EVER have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVER has higher volatility (53.58%) compared to LDOS (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDOS dropped -54.72% vs EVER's -91.18%.
EVER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDOS and EVER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer