LDME.L vs. SEDY.L
LDME.L (L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis) and SEDY.L (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - LDME.L tracks the L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis while SEDY.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDME.L returned 9.82%/yr vs 5.15%/yr for SEDY.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDME.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SEDY.L.
Performance
LDME.L vs. SEDY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDME.L achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than SEDY.L's 8.22% return.
LDME.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SEDY.L
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 20.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
LDME.L vs. SEDY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 11.94% | 16.54% | 11.33% | 10.64% | -2.34% | 7,358.59% |
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 8.22% | 18.70% | 8.71% | 13.01% | -22.64% | 6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDME.L and SEDY.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LDME.L and SEDY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDME.L vs. SEDY.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDME.L
SEDY.L
LDME.L vs. SEDY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDME.L) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDME.L | SEDY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 2.79 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 8.17 | +1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDME.L vs. SEDY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDME.L drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, smaller than the maximum SEDY.L drawdown of -51.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDME.L and SEDY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDME.L | SEDY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -51.33% | +36.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -7.29% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | -11.92% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.82% | -29.67% | +14.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -5.47% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -17.85% | +14.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.50% | -0.08% |
Volatility
LDME.L vs. SEDY.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDME.L) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) at 3.54%. This indicates that LDME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEDY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDME.L | SEDY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.54% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 9.46% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 11.86% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 14.84% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3,216.41% | 16.15% | +3,200.26% |
LDME.L vs. SEDY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDME.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SEDY.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDME.L vs. SEDY.L - Dividend Comparison
LDME.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than SEDY.L's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 2.85% | 3.04% | 3.67% | 3.56% | 4.57% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 5.17% | 5.72% | 7.74% | 7.99% | 9.32% | 6.42% | 5.11% | 5.84% | 5.54% | 4.07% | 4.25% | 6.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDME.L and SEDY.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDME.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDME.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SEDY.L.
LDME.L tracks L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis, while SEDY.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LDME.L and 0.65% for SEDY.L.
Find the right allocation for LDME.L and SEDY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer