LDME.L vs. LDGL.L
LDME.L (L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis) and LDGL.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - LDME.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis, while LDGL.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDME.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for LDGL.L.
Performance
LDME.L vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LDME.L is traded in GBp, while LDGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDGL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
LDME.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
LDGL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 11.58%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDME.L vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 8.96% |
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 12.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDME.L and LDGL.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDME.L vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDME.L
LDGL.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LDME.L vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDME.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDME.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDME.L vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDME.L drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -8.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDME.L and LDGL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDME.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -8.76% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -0.40% | -4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -2.20% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | — | — |
Volatility
LDME.L vs. LDGL.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDME.L | LDGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 13.76% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 13.76% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3,216.41% | 13.76% | +3,202.65% |
LDME.L vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDME.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDME.L vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison
LDME.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than LDGL.L's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 2.85% | 3.04% | 3.67% | 3.56% | 4.57% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDME.L and LDGL.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LDME.L.
LDME.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LDGL.L is Global Equity Income. LDME.L tracks L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis, while LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LDME.L and 0.29% for LDGL.L.
Find the right allocation for LDME.L and LDGL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer