LDLVX vs. QLENX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LDLVX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6) and QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity N) are both mutual funds - LDLVX is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Lord Abbett, while QLENX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, LDLVX returned 2.45%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for QLENX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. LDLVX charges 0.32%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for QLENX.

Performance

LDLVX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDLVX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LDLVX has underperformed QLENX with an annualized return of 2.45%, while QLENX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.

LDLVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 4.53%
• 3Y*: 5.27%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

QLENX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: 15.72%
• 3Y*: 27.31%
• 5Y*: 21.48%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDLVX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LDLVX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6	0.82%	6.28%	4.94%	5.75%	-5.31%	1.21%	3.22%	5.71%	1.54%	1.58%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N	0.10%	34.07%	30.18%	23.67%	18.92%	30.70%	-14.18%	1.01%	-16.64%	15.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LDLVX and QLENX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015	-0.03

Return for Risk

LDLVX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDLVX

LDLVX Risk / Return Rank: 75
LDLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
LDLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LDLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LDLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LDLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

QLENX

QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 48
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDLVX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDLVX	QLENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.16	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.18	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.39	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	2.56	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.90	8.00	+6.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDLVX vs. QLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the QLENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDLVX and QLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDLVX	QLENX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.16	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	2.14	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	1.11	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	1.22	-0.41

Drawdowns

LDLVX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDLVX drawdown since its inception was -9.67%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDLVX and QLENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDLVX	QLENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.67%	-38.50%	+28.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.29%	-6.09%	+4.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.29%	-7.09%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.35%	-17.19%	+9.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.67%	-38.50%	+28.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.53%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-7.48%	+6.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	1.95%	-1.65%

Volatility

LDLVX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) is 0.83%, while AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that LDLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDLVX	QLENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	2.23%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.59%	5.60%	-4.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	7.23%	-4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.79%	10.08%	-7.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.63%	10.58%	-7.95%

LDLVX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDLVX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than QLENX's 5.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDLVX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

LDLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than QLENX's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LDLVX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6	5.25%	5.29%	4.81%	4.76%	2.64%	2.66%	3.11%	3.86%	4.18%	2.99%	0.00%	0.00%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N	1.64%	1.64%	7.13%	21.21%	14.09%	0.00%	1.59%	0.00%	6.09%	8.91%	2.87%	4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDLVX and QLENX in my portfolio?

LDLVX and QLENX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDLVX or QLENX?

QLENX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to LDLVX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDLVX dropped -9.67% vs QLENX's -38.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.