PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDLVX vs. LBNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDLVX vs. LBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDLVX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than LBNDX's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LDLVX has underperformed LBNDX with an annualized return of 2.45%, while LBNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.29% annualized return.


LDLVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
2.45%

LBNDX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.99%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
4.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDLVX vs. LBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDLVX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6
0.82%6.28%4.94%5.75%-5.31%1.21%3.22%5.71%1.54%1.58%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
1.49%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LDLVX and LBNDX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.45

The correlation between LDLVX and LBNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDLVX vs. LBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDLVX
LDLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LDLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LDLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDLVX vs. LBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDLVXLBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.42

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.05

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

8.38

+6.52

LDLVX vs. LBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the LBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDLVX and LBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDLVXLBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.06

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.34

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.85

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.10

-0.28

Drawdowns

LDLVX vs. LBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDLVX drawdown since its inception was -9.67%, smaller than the maximum LBNDX drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDLVX and LBNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDLVXLBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-26.67%

+17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-4.08%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.29%

-4.51%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.35%

-17.33%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.67%

-19.77%

+10.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.50%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-3.52%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.99%

-0.69%

Volatility

LDLVX vs. LBNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) is 0.83%, while Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that LDLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDLVXLBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

1.15%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

3.13%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

4.06%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

4.69%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.63%

5.04%

-2.41%

LDLVX vs. LBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDLVX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than LBNDX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDLVX vs. LBNDX - Dividend Comparison

LDLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than LBNDX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
6.04%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%
LDLVX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6
5.25%5.29%4.81%4.76%2.64%2.66%3.11%3.86%4.18%2.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDLVX and LBNDX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LBNDX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to LDLVX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDLVX dropped -9.67% vs LBNDX's -26.67%.

LBNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDLVX and LBNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer