LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L
LDGL.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and SDIU.L (Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equity Income funds - LDGL.L tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index while SDIU.L tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend v2 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDGL.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SDIU.L.
Performance
LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LDGL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDIU.L
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 12.75% |
SDIU.L Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDGL.L and SDIU.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDGL.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SDIU.L
LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L) and Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDIU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDGL.L | SDIU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDGL.L drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum SDIU.L drawdown of -35.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDGL.L and SDIU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDGL.L | SDIU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -35.60% | +26.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.60% | +3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -18.93% | +16.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDGL.L | SDIU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 11.26% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 17.04% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 17.04% | -2.85% |
LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDGL.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIU.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDGL.L vs. SDIU.L - Dividend Comparison
LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while SDIU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 1.92% |
SDIU.L Global X SuperDividend UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDGL.L and SDIU.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDIU.L.
LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index, while SDIU.L tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LDGL.L and 0.45% for SDIU.L.
Find the right allocation for LDGL.L and SDIU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer