PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L) and Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LDGL.L is traded in USD, while AVWS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AVWS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


LDGL.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.58%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVWS.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
0.82%
YTD
16.94%
6M
18.64%
1Y
37.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDGL.L and AVWS.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDGL.L

AVWS.DE
AVWS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVWS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVWS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVWS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AVWS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVWS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L) and Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc EUR (AVWS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDGL.LAVWS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.29

+0.24

Drawdowns

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDGL.L drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum AVWS.DE drawdown of -22.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDGL.L and AVWS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDGL.LAVWS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-22.00%

+12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-0.50%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-3.20%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

Volatility

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDGL.LAVWS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

15.23%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

17.96%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

17.96%

-2.99%

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDGL.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AVWS.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDGL.L vs. AVWS.DE - Dividend Comparison

LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while AVWS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LDGL.L and AVWS.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AVWS.DE.

LDGL.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while AVWS.DE is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LDGL.L and 0.39% for AVWS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDGL.L and AVWS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer