LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L
LDGG.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDGG.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDGG.L charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.
Performance
LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LDGG.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
LDGG.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- —
LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LDGG.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.22% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 7.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDGG.L and TDGB.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDGG.L
TDGB.L
LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDGG.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDGG.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.43 | 0.98 | +1.45 |
Drawdowns
LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDGG.L drawdown since its inception was -8.72%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDGG.L and TDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDGG.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -29.60% | +20.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -1.47% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -3.70% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.41% | — |
Volatility
LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDGG.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 9.28% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 11.42% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 14.44% | -2.97% |
LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDGG.L has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDGG.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
LDGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDGG.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.20% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDGG.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDGG.L is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDGG.L is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.
LDGG.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. LDGG.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for LDGG.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.
Find the right allocation for LDGG.L and TDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer