LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

LDEU.L (L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and EMAG.L (L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - LDEU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Europe ex UK All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index, while EMAG.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LDEU.L returned 25.10%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for EMAG.L. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. LDEU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EMAG.L.

Performance

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LDEU.L is traded in EUR, while EMAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMAG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEU.L achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly higher than EMAG.L's 4.11% return.

LDEU.L

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 12.07%
• YTD: 15.44%
• 1Y: 29.48%
• 3Y*: 25.10%
• 5Y*: 17.14%
• 10Y*: —

EMAG.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: 2.51%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 1Y: 6.85%
• 3Y*: 5.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LDEU.L L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	15.44%	37.56%	14.64%	16.76%	-3.16%	5.76%
EMAG.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	4.11%	-4.50%	12.65%	3.12%	-5.93%	2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEU.L and EMAG.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021	-0.13

Return for Risk

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEU.L

LDEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LDEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LDEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LDEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LDEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

EMAG.L

EMAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
EMAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
EMAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
EMAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EMAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EMAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LDEU.L	EMAG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	1.24	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	1.83	+1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.22	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	2.53	+1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.09	6.90	+8.20

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the EMAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEU.L and EMAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.16%, which is greater than EMAG.L's maximum drawdown of -10.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEU.L and EMAG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDEU.L	EMAG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.16%	-10.85%	-9.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.80%	-2.88%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.78%	-10.85%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.79%	+2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-4.11%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.06%	+0.89%

Volatility

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAG.L) at 1.58%. This indicates that LDEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDEU.L	EMAG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	1.58%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.36%	4.16%	+5.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	5.92%	+5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	7.68%	+6.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.24%	7.68%	+6.56%

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDEU.L vs. EMAG.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while EMAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMAG.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LDEU.L L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	3.50%	3.47%	4.36%	4.44%	4.17%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDEU.L and EMAG.L in my portfolio?

LDEU.L and EMAG.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LDEU.L or EMAG.L?

On fees, LDEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDEU.L or EMAG.L?

LDEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EMAG.L.

What is the main difference between LDEU.L and EMAG.L?

LDEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while EMAG.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. LDEU.L tracks FTSE Developed Europe ex UK All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index, while EMAG.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG CEMBI Broad Diversified Custom Maturity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEU.L and 0.35% for EMAG.L.