LDEU.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

LDEU.L (L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - LDEU.L tracks the L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEU.L returned 17.00%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LDEU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LDEU.L is traded in EUR, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEU.L achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 19.75% return.

LDEU.L

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: 11.68%
• YTD: 14.76%
• 1Y: 29.16%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 17.00%
• 10Y*: —

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.48%
• 6M: 16.56%
• YTD: 19.75%
• 1Y: 29.99%
• 3Y*: 16.09%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LDEU.L L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis	14.76%	37.56%	14.64%	16.76%	-3.16%	9.14%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	19.75%	19.15%	6.31%	16.82%	-10.18%	9.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEU.L and CMU.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021	0.86

The correlation between LDEU.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEU.L

LDEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
LDEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LDEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LDEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
LDEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LDEU.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	1.95	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.81	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.36	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	2.77	+1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.11	10.68	+4.43

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEU.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.16%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -38.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEU.L and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDEU.L	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.16%	-38.75%	+18.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.80%	-10.61%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.78%	-14.04%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.16%	-23.95%	+3.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-1.70%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-6.76%	+3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.76%	-0.81%

Volatility

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L) is 2.88%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that LDEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDEU.L	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	3.67%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	12.71%	-3.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.66%	15.08%	-3.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.39%	16.05%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.25%	16.82%	-2.57%

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LDEU.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LDEU.L L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis	3.52%	3.47%	4.36%	4.44%	4.17%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDEU.L and CMU.L in my portfolio?

LDEU.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LDEU.L or CMU.L?

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDEU.L or CMU.L?

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEU.L.

What is the main difference between LDEU.L and CMU.L?

LDEU.L tracks L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEU.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.