LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L
LDEM.L (L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and ROBO.L (L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - LDEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Index, while ROBO.L is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEM.L returned 9.87%/yr vs 4.18%/yr for ROBO.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDEM.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for ROBO.L.
Performance
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEM.L achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than ROBO.L's 12.47% return.
LDEM.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 21.35%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
ROBO.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- 6M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.34%
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEM.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.31% | 25.93% | 9.54% | 17.25% | -11.95% | 0.39% |
ROBO.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.47% | 23.22% | -1.60% | 25.20% | -33.80% | 7.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEM.L and ROBO.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.66 |
The correlation between LDEM.L and ROBO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
-
Technology
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
Industrials
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
Consumer Cyclical
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
Basic Materials
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
-
Consumer Defensive
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
-
Utilities
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
-
Energy
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
-
Communication Services
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
Healthcare
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
Real Estate
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDEM.L
ROBO.L
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDEM.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDEM.L | ROBO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.68 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 5.37 | +2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum ROBO.L drawdown of -42.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM.L and ROBO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEM.L | ROBO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.82% | -42.74% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -16.23% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.16% | -28.70% | +11.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.82% | -42.74% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -13.36% | +8.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -13.17% | +6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 5.08% | -2.31% |
Volatility
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDEM.L) is 4.76%, while L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ROBO.L) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that LDEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEM.L | ROBO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 9.89% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 22.18% | -10.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 26.33% | -12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 24.21% | -9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 22.46% | -7.95% |
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEM.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDEM.L vs. ROBO.L - Dividend Comparison
LDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while ROBO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEM.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.36% | 3.59% | 3.85% | 3.74% | 5.33% | 1.41% |
ROBO.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEM.L and ROBO.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDEM.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDEM.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBO.L.
LDEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ROBO.L is Robotics. LDEM.L tracks FTSE Emerging All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Index, while ROBO.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LDEM.L and 0.80% for ROBO.L.
Find the right allocation for LDEM.L and ROBO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer