PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDEM.L) and L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (LGEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LDEM.L is traded in USD, while LGEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LGEU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEM.L achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than LGEU.L's 7.61% return.


LDEM.L

1D
0.46%
1M
-3.32%
6M
6.83%
YTD
11.31%
1Y
21.35%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.70%

LGEU.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.64%
6M
5.82%
YTD
7.61%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDEM.L
L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
11.31%25.93%9.54%17.25%-11.95%0.39%
LGEU.L
L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
7.61%36.05%0.09%21.70%-17.07%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEM.L and LGEU.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021

0.64

The correlation between LDEM.L and LGEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDEM.L
LGEU.L

Financial Services

26.5%
24.1%

Technology

19.9%
12.6%

Industrials

12.5%
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
7.0%

Basic Materials

7.4%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
6.7%

Utilities

6.7%
4.6%

Energy

5.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.3%

Healthcare

3.1%
13.2%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.6%

Financial Services

LDEM.L
26.5%
LGEU.L
24.1%

Technology

LDEM.L
19.9%
LGEU.L
12.6%

Industrials

LDEM.L
12.5%
LGEU.L
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

LDEM.L
8.0%
LGEU.L
7.0%

Basic Materials

LDEM.L
7.4%
LGEU.L
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

LDEM.L
7.1%
LGEU.L
6.7%

Utilities

LDEM.L
6.7%
LGEU.L
4.6%

Energy

LDEM.L
5.0%
LGEU.L
3.1%

Communication Services

LDEM.L
3.8%
LGEU.L
3.3%

Healthcare

LDEM.L
3.1%
LGEU.L
13.2%

Real Estate

LDEM.L
0.2%
LGEU.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEM.L
LDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

LGEU.L
LGEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LGEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDEM.L) and L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (LGEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDEM.LLGEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.51

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

5.41

+2.28

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the LGEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEM.L and LGEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum LGEU.L drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM.L and LGEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDEM.LLGEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-33.95%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-11.92%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

-15.31%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.82%

-33.95%

+8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-2.64%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-6.29%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.33%

-0.56%

Volatility

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDEM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (LGEU.L) at 4.22%. This indicates that LDEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDEM.LLGEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.22%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.92%

13.12%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

15.75%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

18.26%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

19.35%

-4.84%

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEM.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LGEU.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDEM.L vs. LGEU.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while LGEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LDEM.L
L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.36%3.59%3.85%3.74%5.33%1.41%
LGEU.L
L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDEM.L and LGEU.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGEU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGEU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LDEM.L.

LDEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LGEU.L is Europe Equities. LDEM.L tracks FTSE Emerging All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Index, while LGEU.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Europe ex UK Large & Mid Cap EUR Index NTR. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LDEM.L and 0.10% for LGEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDEM.L and LGEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer