LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

LGEU.L (L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF) and LGJP.L (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGEU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF, while LGJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGEU.L returned 9.66%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for LGJP.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.

Performance

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LGEU.L is traded in EUR, while LGJP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGJP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGEU.L achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly lower than LGJP.L's 18.65% return.

LGEU.L

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 6.63%
• YTD: 10.65%
• 1Y: 20.38%
• 3Y*: 14.31%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: —

LGJP.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.33%
• 6M: 11.71%
• YTD: 18.65%
• 1Y: 36.35%
• 3Y*: 17.38%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LGEU.L L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF	10.65%	19.94%	6.68%	17.97%	-11.77%	24.90%	1.53%	30.71%	-9.44%
LGJP.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF	18.65%	10.76%	15.51%	16.65%	-11.60%	8.61%	6.97%	21.27%	-8.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LGEU.L and LGJP.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.58

The correlation between LGEU.L and LGJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGEU.L

LGEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
LGEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LGEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LGEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
LGEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LGEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

LGJP.L

LGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGEU.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.80	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.57	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	3.45	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	11.03	-2.88

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGEU.L and LGJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGEU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.27%, which is greater than LGJP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGEU.L and LGJP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGEU.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.27%	-28.36%	-5.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-10.48%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.41%	-16.30%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.68%	-18.92%	-3.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-2.99%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-5.41%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	3.29%	-0.69%

Volatility

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGEU.L) is 3.68%, while L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that LGEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGEU.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	6.34%	-2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.29%	16.75%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.72%	20.11%	-6.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	17.39%	-2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	17.96%	-0.97%

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LGEU.L and LGJP.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LGEU.L vs. LGJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LGEU.L nor LGJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGEU.L and LGJP.L in my portfolio?

LGEU.L and LGJP.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LGEU.L or LGJP.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LGEU.L or LGJP.L?

LGEU.L and LGJP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

What is the main difference between LGEU.L and LGJP.L?

LGEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while LGJP.L is Japan Equities. LGEU.L tracks L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF, while LGJP.L tracks L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF.