PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly higher than XD3E.L's 8.43% return.


LDEG.L

1D
-0.91%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
9.41%
6M
13.12%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*

XD3E.L

1D
0.18%
1M
1.56%
YTD
8.43%
6M
10.69%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
9.41%44.91%8.81%14.31%1.91%-8.28%
XD3E.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D
8.43%39.69%5.65%15.53%-4.31%3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEG.L and XD3E.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2021

0.90

The correlation between LDEG.L and XD3E.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDEG.L
XD3E.L

Financial Services

41.5%
30.2%

Industrials

15.8%
8.1%

Basic Materials

9.9%
7.5%

Utilities

8.2%
7.9%

Energy

7.7%
14.8%

Communication Services

5.2%
0.0%

Healthcare

3.4%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
8.4%

Technology

2.0%
1.7%

Real Estate

-

3.5%

Financial Services

LDEG.L
41.5%
XD3E.L
30.2%

Industrials

LDEG.L
15.8%
XD3E.L
8.1%

Basic Materials

LDEG.L
9.9%
XD3E.L
7.5%

Utilities

LDEG.L
8.2%
XD3E.L
7.9%

Energy

LDEG.L
7.7%
XD3E.L
14.8%

Communication Services

LDEG.L
5.2%
XD3E.L
0.0%

Healthcare

LDEG.L
3.4%
XD3E.L
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LDEG.L
3.3%
XD3E.L
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

LDEG.L
3.1%
XD3E.L
8.4%

Technology

LDEG.L
2.0%
XD3E.L
1.7%

Real Estate

LDEG.L

-

XD3E.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XD3E.L
XD3E.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XD3E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XD3E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDEG.LXD3E.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

2.47

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

8.59

+4.51

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the XD3E.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEG.L and XD3E.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDEG.LXD3E.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.03

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.83

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.10

+0.73

Drawdowns

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum XD3E.L drawdown of -70.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and XD3E.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDEG.LXD3E.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-70.47%

+48.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-9.10%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

-12.64%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.39%

-21.23%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-0.98%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-25.07%

+19.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.62%

-0.41%

Volatility

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (XD3E.L) at 2.33%. This indicates that LDEG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XD3E.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDEG.LXD3E.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

2.33%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

8.68%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

11.07%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

14.58%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

15.61%

-0.38%

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XD3E.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDEG.L vs. XD3E.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than XD3E.L's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.15%3.42%4.20%4.10%3.69%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XD3E.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D
4.53%4.91%5.50%4.27%4.42%5.89%5.87%2.39%4.49%2.88%2.71%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDEG.L and XD3E.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XD3E.L.

LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while XD3E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.30% for XD3E.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and XD3E.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer