LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) and EMDG.L (L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDEG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while EMDG.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEG.L returned 16.25%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for EMDG.L. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly higher than EMDG.L's 3.37% return.

LDEG.L

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.81%
• 1Y: 31.54%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: 16.25%
• 10Y*: —

EMDG.L

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 6M: 3.90%
• 1Y: 9.68%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: 3.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF	11.36%	44.91%	8.81%	14.31%	1.91%	-8.28%
EMDG.L L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	3.37%	2.35%	10.43%	1.99%	0.28%	1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEG.L and EMDG.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021	-0.00

Return for Risk

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEG.L

LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EMDG.L

EMDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EMDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
EMDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
EMDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EMDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LDEG.L	EMDG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.62	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	2.52	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.29	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	2.57	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.21	7.46	+6.74

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEG.L and EMDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum EMDG.L drawdown of -30.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and EMDG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDEG.L	EMDG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.96%	-30.84%	+8.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.04%	-3.76%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.05%	-7.93%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.39%	-12.32%	-5.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-10.98%	+9.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	-22.05%	+16.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	1.29%	+0.92%

Volatility

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) at 1.82%. This indicates that LDEG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDEG.L	EMDG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	1.82%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.58%	4.27%	+5.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	5.94%	+5.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	7.86%	+6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	13.19%	+2.02%

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LDEG.L and EMDG.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LDEG.L vs. EMDG.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than EMDG.L's 5.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMDG.L L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	5.24%	5.95%	5.95%	4.65%	2.91%	1.21%
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF	3.62%	3.42%	4.20%	4.10%	3.69%	3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDEG.L and EMDG.L in my portfolio?

LDEG.L and EMDG.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LDEG.L or EMDG.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDEG.L or EMDG.L?

LDEG.L and EMDG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between LDEG.L and EMDG.L?

LDEG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while EMDG.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while EMDG.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD.