LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L
LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) and CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDEG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while CMFP.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEG.L returned 16.11%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for CMFP.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDEG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CMFP.L.
Performance
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than CMFP.L's 19.16% return.
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
CMFP.L
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 19.16%
- 6M
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.41% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 19.16% | 8.49% | 6.86% | -11.43% | 32.79% | 14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEG.L and CMFP.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between LDEG.L and CMFP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
Industrials
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
-
Basic Materials
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
Utilities
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
-
Energy
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
-
Communication Services
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
Healthcare
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
Consumer Defensive
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
Technology
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
Real Estate
LDEG.L
-
CMFP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDEG.L
CMFP.L
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDEG.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.39 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 4.81 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 11.77 | +2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDEG.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.16 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.89 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.27 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.97%, smaller than the maximum CMFP.L drawdown of -50.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and CMFP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEG.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -50.47% | +34.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -6.63% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -12.97% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.97% | -23.51% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -3.64% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -24.51% | +21.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.71% | -0.51% |
Volatility
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) is 3.57%, while L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that LDEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMFP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEG.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 4.82% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 12.18% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 14.73% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 14.86% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 13.92% | +2.09% |
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CMFP.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDEG.L vs. CMFP.L - Dividend Comparison
LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while CMFP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEG.L and CMFP.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CMFP.L.
LDEG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CMFP.L is Commodities. LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while CMFP.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.30% for CMFP.L.
Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and CMFP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer