LDDR vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LDDR (LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - LDDR is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by STONE RIDGE, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). LDDR is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, LDDR returned 3.60% vs 32.82% for YCS. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. LDDR charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

LDDR vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF (LDDR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDDR achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.

LDDR

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 6M: -0.43%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 32.82%
• 3Y*: 19.84%
• 5Y*: 23.54%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDDR vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LDDR LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF	-0.24%	6.74%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	7.17%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LDDR and YCS is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025	-0.43

The correlation between LDDR and YCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.43 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LDDR vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDDR

LDDR Risk / Return Rank: 31
LDDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LDDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LDDR Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LDDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
LDDR Martin Ratio Rank: 30

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 61
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 56
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDDR vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF (LDDR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDDR	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.92	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.44	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.35	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	3.97	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.30	12.40	-8.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LDDR vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDDR Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDDR and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDDR	YCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	1.92	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.33	+0.82

Drawdowns

LDDR vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDDR drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDDR and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDDR	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-49.56%	+47.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.50%	-8.30%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	0.00%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-19.93%	+19.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	2.66%	-1.82%

Volatility

LDDR vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF (LDDR) is 1.00%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that LDDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDDR	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	2.75%	-1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.18%	12.32%	-10.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23%	17.27%	-14.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.02%	21.10%	-17.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.02%	19.01%	-14.99%

LDDR vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDDR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDDR vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

LDDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.68%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LDDR LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF	12.68%	14.63%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDDR and YCS in my portfolio?

LDDR and YCS have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDDR or YCS?

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to LDDR (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDDR dropped -2.50% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, LDDR or YCS?

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 32.82% vs 3.60% for LDDR. On fees, LDDR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LDDR has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LDDR or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 32.82% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDDR or YCS?

LDDR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LDDR or YCS?

LDDR has the higher dividend yield at 12.68%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between LDDR and YCS?

LDDR is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: STONE RIDGE and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDDR and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.