PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDDR vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDDR vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF (LDDR) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDDR achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than UUP's 5.03% return.


LDDR

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.29%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UUP

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.57%
6M
3.80%
YTD
5.03%
1Y
7.58%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDDR vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDDR and UUP is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025

-0.34

The correlation between LDDR and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (1 year) to -0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDDR vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDDR
LDDR Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LDDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDDR Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LDDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDDR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDDR vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF (LDDR) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDDRUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.09

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

5.73

-2.95

LDDR vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDDR and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDDR vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDDR drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDDR and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDDRUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-22.19%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-3.65%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-1.64%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-8.88%

+8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.33%

-0.36%

Volatility

LDDR vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF (LDDR) is 1.04%, while Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that LDDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDDRUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.46%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

4.36%

-2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

6.03%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

7.21%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

6.90%

-2.92%

LDDR vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDDR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDDR vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

LDDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, more than UUP's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDDR
LifeX 2035 Income Bucket ETF
12.83%14.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.26%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDDR and UUP have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUP has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to LDDR (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDDR dropped -2.50% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 1-year performance, UUP leads with 7.58% vs 2.70% for LDDR. On fees, LDDR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LDDR has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UUP has performed better with a 7.58% return vs 2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDDR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

LDDR has the higher dividend yield at 12.83%, compared with 3.26% for UUP.

LDDR is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while UUP is Currency. They also come from different issuers: STONE RIDGE and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDDR and 0.75% for UUP.

UUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDDR and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer