LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE
LDAX.DE (Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - LDAX.DE tracks the DAX® while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDAX.DE returned 9.29%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LDAX.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDAX.DE achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 18.14% return.
LDAX.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 1.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- —
AMED.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDAX.DE Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist | 1.18% | 22.70% | 18.08% | 19.61% | -12.89% | 15.29% | 8.40% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 18.14% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDAX.DE and AMED.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between LDAX.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LDAX.DE
AMED.DE
LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist (LDAX.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDAX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.35 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 2.67 | -2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.44 | 10.34 | -9.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDAX.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDAX.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDAX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.68% | -38.35% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -10.56% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.92% | -14.07% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.68% | -24.06% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -2.75% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -5.58% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 2.73% | +1.20% |
Volatility
LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist (LDAX.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) at 3.63%. This indicates that LDAX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDAX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 3.63% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 12.98% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.26% | 15.28% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 15.87% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 17.34% | +0.02% |
LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDAX.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LDAX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
LDAX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDAX.DE Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Dist | 1.93% | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 2.73% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDAX.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDAX.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDAX.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
LDAX.DE tracks DAX®, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LDAX.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for LDAX.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer