LDAG.L vs. MPXG.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

LDAG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF) and MPXG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LDAG.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD while MPXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. LDAG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MPXG.L.

Performance

LDAG.L vs. MPXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LDAG.L

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 13.86%
• 1Y: 35.10%
• 3Y*: 17.40%
• 5Y*: 9.80%
• 10Y*: —

MPXG.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LDAG.L vs. MPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDAG.L

LDAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
LDAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LDAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
LDAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
LDAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
LDAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDAG.L vs. MPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LDAG.L	MPXG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.97	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LDAG.L	MPXG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LDAG.L	MPXG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LDAG.L	MPXG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.69%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.76%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.73%	—	—

LDAG.L vs. MPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDAG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MPXG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDAG.L vs. MPXG.L - Dividend Comparison

LDAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, while MPXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LDAG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF	3.81%	4.23%	4.75%	5.40%	4.80%	2.19%
MPXG.L Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, LDAG.L or MPXG.L?

On fees, MPXG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDAG.L or MPXG.L?

MPXG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LDAG.L.

What is the main difference between LDAG.L and MPXG.L?

LDAG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while MPXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LDAG.L and 0.15% for MPXG.L.