LCWD.L vs. AMEW.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWD.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE).

LCWD.L and AMEW.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCWD.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 28, 2018. AMEW.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both LCWD.L and AMEW.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LCWD.L vs. AMEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWD.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LCWD.L vs. AMEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCWD.L Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF	0.00%	4.01%	19.12%	24.28%	-18.85%	22.86%	15.93%	26.94%	-7.97%
AMEW.DE Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR	-2.72%	21.27%	18.57%	23.73%	-18.63%	22.20%	15.62%	28.33%	-8.66%

Different Trading Currencies

LCWD.L is traded in USD, while AMEW.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AMEW.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

LCWD.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMEW.DE

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -3.94%
• YTD: -2.72%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: 17.35%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCWD.L vs. AMEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEW.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.

AMEW.DE

Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR

LCWD.L

Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

LCWD.L vs. AMEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEW.DE

AMEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 43
AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
AMEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
AMEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 38
AMEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
AMEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCWD.L vs. AMEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWD.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCWD.L	AMEW.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.74	—

Correlation

The correlation between LCWD.L and AMEW.DE is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LCWD.L vs. AMEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCWD.L nor AMEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LCWD.L	AMEW.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.73%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.69%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.18%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.34%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LCWD.L	AMEW.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.57%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.57%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.83%	—