PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AMEW.DE
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
-1.44%7.42%25.77%19.94%-13.88%32.66%5.32%31.10%-9.13%
XAMB.DE
Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc
-0.60%2.25%15.42%20.65%-17.81%36.43%7.63%32.88%-7.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEW.DE achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than XAMB.DE's -0.60% return.


AMEW.DE

1D
1.98%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
1.90%
1Y
11.72%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*
11.69%

XAMB.DE

1D
2.53%
1M
-3.94%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
2.24%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEW.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XAMB.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEW.DE
AMEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XAMB.DE
XAMB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XAMB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAMB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMEW.DEXAMB.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

0.56

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

0.87

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.15

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.92

3.99

+1.93

AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the XAMB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEW.DE and XAMB.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMEW.DEXAMB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

0.56

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.51

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.64

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between AMEW.DE and XAMB.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMEW.DE nor XAMB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, which is greater than XAMB.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEW.DE and XAMB.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEW.DEXAMB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-31.83%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-12.48%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.69%

-22.09%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-5.47%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-5.71%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.42%

-0.42%

Volatility

AMEW.DE vs. XAMB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) is 4.30%, while Amundi MSCI World SRI Climate Net Zero Ambition PAB UCITS ETF Acc (XAMB.DE) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that AMEW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAMB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMEW.DEXAMB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

5.01%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

9.57%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

16.71%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

14.85%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

16.43%

-1.34%