PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LCWD.L vs. VWRL.AS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LCWD.LVWRL.AS
YTD Return15.61%14.71%
1Y Return25.27%19.10%
3Y Return (Ann)7.09%7.78%
5Y Return (Ann)12.24%10.76%
Sharpe Ratio1.981.97
Daily Std Dev12.37%10.54%
Max Drawdown-34.16%-33.27%
Current Drawdown-0.53%-2.05%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between LCWD.L and VWRL.AS is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

LCWD.L vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LCWD.L achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly higher than VWRL.AS's 14.71% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.91%
7.32%
LCWD.L
VWRL.AS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCWD.L vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.AS's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


VWRL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for VWRL.AS: current value at 0.22% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.22%
Expense ratio chart for LCWD.L: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LCWD.L vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCWD.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LCWD.L, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LCWD.L, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LCWD.L, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LCWD.L, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LCWD.L, currently valued at 14.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.38
VWRL.AS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VWRL.AS, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VWRL.AS, currently valued at 3.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VWRL.AS, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VWRL.AS, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VWRL.AS, currently valued at 14.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.39

LCWD.L vs. VWRL.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which roughly equals the VWRL.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LCWD.L and VWRL.AS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.31
2.36
LCWD.L
VWRL.AS

Dividends

LCWD.L vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison

LCWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LCWD.L
Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.56%1.74%2.10%1.43%1.56%1.89%2.24%1.93%1.95%2.03%2.06%1.57%

Drawdowns

LCWD.L vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCWD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRL.AS drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCWD.L and VWRL.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.53%
-0.66%
LCWD.L
VWRL.AS

Volatility

LCWD.L vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core MSCI World (DR) UCITS ETF (LCWD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.82%
3.91%
LCWD.L
VWRL.AS