PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) (IG35.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LCVB.DE having a 0.94% return and IG35.DE slightly lower at 0.90%.


LCVB.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.94%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
0.67%
3Y*
1.93%
5Y*
-1.08%
10Y*
-0.35%

IG35.DE

1D
0.25%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.90%
6M
0.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCVB.DE and IG35.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCVB.DE
LCVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LCVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IG35.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist (LCVB.DE) and iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) (IG35.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCVB.DEIG35.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCVB.DEIG35.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.11

+0.47

Drawdowns

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.50%, which is greater than IG35.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCVB.DE and IG35.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCVB.DEIG35.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-4.08%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-1.08%

-5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-1.38%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

Volatility

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCVB.DEIG35.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55%

5.22%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

5.22%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.54%

5.22%

-2.68%

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCVB.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IG35.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCVB.DE vs. IG35.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCVB.DE nor IG35.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IG35.DE
iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCVB.DE
Amundi Euro Corporate 0-1Y ESG UCITS ETF Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.51%0.82%1.26%1.51%1.80%2.86%0.31%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCVB.DE and IG35.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCVB.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCVB.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IG35.DE.

LCVB.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG EUR Corporates 0-1, while IG35.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI December 2035 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for LCVB.DE and 0.12% for IG35.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCVB.DE and IG35.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer