LCUK.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both exchange-traded funds - LCUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while PACW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LCUK.L returned 16.53% vs 30.29% for PACW.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCUK.L charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUK.L achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.

LCUK.L

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 6M: 5.05%
• 1Y: 16.53%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: —

PACW.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	5.93%	13.17%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	11.92%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUK.L and PACW.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.54

The correlation between LCUK.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUK.L

LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 38
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCUK.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.89	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	3.95	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.55	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	4.27	-2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.79	17.43	-11.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUK.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCUK.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	2.89	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.24	-0.73

Drawdowns

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUK.L drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUK.L and PACW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCUK.L	PACW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.54%	-17.68%	-17.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-7.06%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.98%	-0.46%	-3.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-3.02%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	1.73%	+1.12%

Volatility

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that LCUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCUK.L	PACW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	2.93%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	7.75%	+2.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.92%	10.42%	+1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.97%	13.91%	-0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	13.91%	+1.78%

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUK.L has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCUK.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

LCUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	3.68%	3.05%	3.94%	3.86%	3.00%	3.48%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCUK.L and PACW.L in my portfolio?

LCUK.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCUK.L or PACW.L?

On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCUK.L or PACW.L?

LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for PACW.L.

What is the main difference between LCUK.L and PACW.L?

LCUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while PACW.L is Global Equities. LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for LCUK.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.