LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L
LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and FTAL.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, from Amundi and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUK.L returned 10.01%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for FTAL.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LCUK.L charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FTAL.L.
Performance
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with LCUK.L at 5.93% and FTAL.L at 5.93%.
LCUK.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
FTAL.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.93% | 21.01% | 9.05% | 7.25% | 2.15% | 18.06% | -11.83% | 18.73% | -0.85% |
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 5.93% | 23.19% | 9.03% | 7.92% | 0.55% | 17.18% | -9.96% | 19.29% | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUK.L and FTAL.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between LCUK.L and FTAL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Industrials
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Consumer Defensive
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Healthcare
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Energy
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Basic Materials
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Utilities
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Communication Services
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Real Estate
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Technology
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCUK.L
FTAL.L
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) and SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCUK.L | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 2.26 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 7.66 | -1.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCUK.L | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.87 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.81 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.56 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUK.L drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, roughly equal to the maximum FTAL.L drawdown of -35.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUK.L and FTAL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUK.L | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -35.26% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -8.95% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -13.17% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.65% | -13.17% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -3.78% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -4.31% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.65% | +0.20% |
Volatility
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) is 3.76%, while SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that LCUK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUK.L | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 4.08% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 9.45% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 10.84% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 12.68% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 14.75% | +0.94% |
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCUK.L has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAL.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCUK.L vs. FTAL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCUK.L nor FTAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 3.94% | 3.86% | 3.00% | 3.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, LCUK.L and FTAL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FTAL.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for LCUK.L and 0.20% for FTAL.L.
Find the right allocation for LCUK.L and FTAL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer